Cursed thoughts shared in discussions that is ridiculous and absurd in nature that it became a meme. Usually about popular characters and people.
If he ejaculates semen it’s because his body is full of toxins and he has had too many sexual partners. Men are not supposed to have semen it’s unclean. Vegan men with few sex partners ejaculate fresh water. Find a virginal man and leave these McDonald’s eating thots alone!
Stay woke sis 👁👁🧠🧘🏿♀️
If you're blindfolded and getting your dick sucked, you're in a superposition of it being simultaneously gay and not gay, since you don't know if it's a guy sucking your dick or a girl. Therefore it would be logical to assume that both cases are true, and that the quantum system (you getting sucked off) is in multiple states (gay and not gay) at once: the very definition of a superposition. The moment you remove the blindfold, this system collapses, as you are making a measurement as to whether or not a guy or a girl is sucking you off; whether or not it's gay. This irreversibly destroys the superposition, as even if you put the blindfold back on, the uncertainty is no longer present.
I’m not even going to lie here, but I know I’m going to get hate. Orc women are just so much hotter than your average human female. They are big, buff, and green. I find them much more attractive overall.
I was fingering a guy, and I was really getting in there and fingering his prostate. He eventually start to tense up and say "I'm going to cum" so I thought I was milking his prostate. But something else happened instead. a diarhea like substance started spewing from his anus. At first I thought he shit the bed, but he insisted it was anal squirting. There substance was creamier than shit and had a lighter brown color to it. I sniffed my finger and it smelt like cum, not shit. So is anal squiting a thing?
Kermit the frog caused 9/11. In the 2002 TV film "It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie", there's a part where an angel shows Kermit an alternate reality where he was never born. For whatever reason, the editors didn't really think about it, and continued to use footage with the twin towers still standing for this scene, however they aren't there in his original universe. Therefore, something that Kermit did in his life, did in fact cause 9/11 in Muppet lore.It is actual Muppets canon that Kermit the Frog, in some way, had a role in bringing down the Twin Towers in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
In "It's a Very Muppets Christmas Movie," a film released in late 2002, Kermit is shown a glimpse of what New York City might look like if he had never been born. Among the scenery of this alternate reality NYC, we find none other than the Twin Towers proudly standing in the background. They were, of course, long destroyed in Kermit's normal reality. And yet, in the world without Kermit, the war on terror is missing its powder keg spark. Who would've thought that green piece of fuck could kermit a terror attack on US soil, but there it stands unimpeachable... We have concrete, canon proof of involvement. Why the world hasn't stopped and asked further questions is only further proof of a media cabal keeping this conversation away from the masses.
The Twin Towers would still be standing if it weren't for Kermit the Frog. Al Qaeda was the puppet this time, and Kermit the hand within.
Now, if we are to believe the crew, this was allegedly just a production oversight, meaning that Kermit is somehow not responsible for 9/11. The frog puppet is said to have had no role in the destruction of that beautiful American beacon of freedom, and any links to the contrary are just inconvenient (or should I say convenient) coincidence. The crew alleges that there's no value in searching out ties between Muppet lobbyists and the Saudi regime, so there's no sense in following the money to see underlying truth. There's ostensibly no reason to assume that the towers haven't already been avenged with that famous "we got him" speech given by Obama back in 2012. There's apparently no reason to question the truth any further. But that's none of my business.
If two virgins fuck and take each other's virginity, shouldn't they still have one each? Because, think about it... The definition of take is to capture and receive something, like, if little Bob got 10 dollars and I rudely took it from him, he'd most likely cry, but I'd also gain 10 dollars since I took 10 dollars from him, no? Shouldn't it be the same with virginity, but hopefully, just without the crying? You take a virginty and lose one in the process, so it should be plus-minus zero, I should still have one virginty left? So if I only fuck virgins, will I be a virgin forever? And can I have multiple virginities if I take from other virgins?