Skip to content

Kermit the frog did 9/11

    I knew it all along!
    Kermit the frog caused 9/11. In the 2002 TV film "It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie", there's a part where an angel shows Kermit an alternate reality where he was never born. For whatever reason, the editors didn't really think about it, and continued to use footage with the twin towers still standing for this scene, however they aren't there in his original universe. Therefore, something that Kermit did in his life, did in fact cause 9/11 in Muppet lore.
    It is actual Muppets canon that Kermit the Frog, in some way, had a role in bringing down the Twin Towers in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
    
    In "It's a Very Muppets Christmas Movie," a film released in late 2002, Kermit is shown a glimpse of what New York City might look like if he had never been born. Among the scenery of this alternate reality NYC, we find none other than the Twin Towers proudly standing in the background. They were, of course, long destroyed in Kermit's normal reality. And yet, in the world without Kermit, the war on terror is missing its powder keg spark. Who would've thought that green piece of fuck could kermit a terror attack on US soil, but there it stands unimpeachable... We have concrete, canon proof of involvement. Why the world hasn't stopped and asked further questions is only further proof of a media cabal keeping this conversation away from the masses.
    
    The Twin Towers would still be standing if it weren't for Kermit the Frog. Al Qaeda was the puppet this time, and Kermit the hand within.
    
    Now, if we are to believe the crew, this was allegedly just a production oversight, meaning that Kermit is somehow not responsible for 9/11. The frog puppet is said to have had no role in the destruction of that beautiful American beacon of freedom, and any links to the contrary are just inconvenient (or should I say convenient) coincidence. The crew alleges that there's no value in searching out ties between Muppet lobbyists and the Saudi regime, so there's no sense in following the money to see underlying truth. There's ostensibly no reason to assume that the towers haven't already been avenged with that famous "we got him" speech given by Obama back in 2012. There's apparently no reason to question the truth any further. But that's none of my business.